I recently came across a situation where a pair of glasses, normally priced at €22 when bought directly from BoohooMan, is being offered for less than €5 elsewhere. It appears that the glasses, which share the exact design and color scheme as the premium version, might be part of a dropshipping model or another low-cost sales strategy. I’m curious about whether the drastic price difference indicates an alternative supply method or if it’s simply a reflection of different marketing tactics. Any insights or further experiences with such pricing tactics are welcome.
BoohooMan’s pricing strategy appears to be a reflection of a more complex supply chain management rather than solely dropshipping. From my experience, such discrepancies often occur when brands target distinct consumer segments by sourcing similar products through different channels. The lower price might indicate the use of a cost-effective supply method, possibly directly from an alternative manufacturer that uses different quality materials or packaging. This approach is likely intended to test market responses while reducing inventory overhead, without compromising their premium offerings elsewhere.
i guess it might be a strat to test diff suppliars, not drop shipping per se. lower prices can mean local stock or different sourcing trials for other market segments. just my two cents
From my perspective, it appears that this steep price difference is part of a deliberate strategy to explore alternative distribution channels and measure consumer response. Observations from similar cases suggest that companies might deliberately experiment with pricing minor lines or testing smaller, cost-effective suppliers. This approach can help a brand gather actionable data on market preferences while optimizing logistics and supply chain costs. In this scenario, using a reduced price as a testing mechanism may be an intelligent way to adjust overall inventory and market segmentation strategies.
Hey everyone, I’ve been mulling over this too and wondering if the pricing difference might be a way for BoohooMan to test out market responses with different sourcing partners. Maybe they’re experimenting with alternative manufacturing for some product lines to see if they can cut costs or reach a different customer base. It’s interesting because it makes you wonder if this approach is a one-off for the glasses or if it might become a broader strategy. Have any of you encountered similar pricing puzzles with other brands? It would be cool to hear if someone has more insight into how often such tactics are seen or if they think it’s a trend that’ll continue in the fashion retail world.
hey guys, maybe boohoo is simply teting out diff distribrter routs. sometimes cheaper items arnt always low qualty but reflect an expimental sourcing method. im curious if this could mean long-term strategics change later on, wheres ur thoughts?