For every Rs.500 tournament entry fee, an additional Rs.12 is deducted as processing charges. Given that many payment service providers offer free transactions via UPI, AP CHESS should consider opting for a more affordable payment gateway solution.
Hey, reading through the discussion here got me wondering a bit more about how exactly these processing fees are justified. I mean, if UPI is practically free and more streamlined, what might be the cost being covered by that Rs.12? Is it really a matter of infrastructure, or are there other hidden reasons behind this surcharge? I’m really curious if anyone else has insights or experiences with alternative payment gateways in your tournaments. Would make for a cool conversation if we could dive deeper into why these fees exist and whether the benefits of a more expensive gateway somehow balance out in the long run. What do you all think?
Based on my own experience with online tournaments, the extra Rs.12 fee may be seen as a way to cover small transaction costs that aren’t immediately obvious, such as maintaining server security or handling refunds. However, the minimal expense of UPI transactions does raise questions about whether these costs are justified. In previous events I participated in, transparency regarding such fees was limited. A closer examination of alternative payment gateways, potentially with better value propositions, might be warranted when cost-effectiveness is a concern. Overall, there remains a need for better clarification on why these specific fees are applied despite the low cost of digital transactions.
imho its odd they charge extra when upi costs next to nothing. maybe its to cover backend stuff, but a bit more clarity would go a long way for us players.
Hey everyone, I couldn’t help but notice there seems to be a bit of a mystery as to what exactly those extra few rupees are cashing in for. It’s fascinating because on the surface, when UPI transactions practically have no processing fee, it gets a bit puzzling. Could there be some hidden layers of security or maybe other reasons, like integration costs or maintenance of payment systems that we aren’t aware of? Would love to hear if anyone has come across any detailed breakdowns or even positive experiences with alternatives where the fee structure is more transparent. Maybe there’s a behind-the-scenes aspect that we’re missing? Keen to hear your thoughts and any potential alternatives you might have encountered.
Based on my experience, the additional fee can often serve as a buffer for unforeseen operational costs that aren’t immediately apparent. While UPI transactions are low cost, expenses such as maintaining secure payment gateways, managing digital transactions reliability, and handling potential disputes may subtly accumulate over time. I have also noticed that transparent communication regarding fee allocation is frequently lacking, which leaves room for doubt. It would be beneficial if AP CHESS provided a clear breakdown of these fees for greater accountability and to reassure users about the safety and efficiency of the system.